Apple vs Windows/Android

     Apple sucks. Before anyone can get their pitchforks sharpened, I mean the company because everything they do is overpriced. That said, even I have to admit that they make some good stuff. But, when is that stuff actually useful? Come to think of it, when is Windows stuff useful? Or Android?

What? You don't care? Too bad, I have due dates.

Computers

Windows - Even if you love Apple, odds are you have a Windows computer somewhere in your house. Windows computers offer the biggest variety of software, have the most customizability, and, most importantly, can play video games. Windows desktop systems (unlike Apple and the extremely few that exist featuring Android) are (usually) fully upgradeable and customizable when hardware needs reworked. Windows computers also always have the best hardware available, because as soon as something is released it can be shoved into a preexisting computer. Support is usually pretty good, with DIY guides for basically whatever you want if the actual support is terrible.

Apple - Somehow or another, Apple makes the best equipment for creating and editing videos and photos even though all of its computers have absolutely shameful components. So if you're using it for that, good job. However. Other than a few minor repairs, fixing something wrong with a computer by Apple is either impossible, or actually is impossible. In addition, for anything other than video creation (which apparently involves magic), Apple computers are behind Windows computers. Mac Pros, for example, still use a processor type from a few years ago, even with the pretty major advancements made in that time.

Android - For now, these really aren't that common and don't actually really have any audience that isn't covered by the other two. So I'll go over Linux instead! It's practically the same thing anyway. Linux is actually a really, really no-frills system. Like, if every operating system was a pizza, Apple would be a non-customizable special with gold flakes, Windows would be a standard anything you want, and Linux would be a handful of tomatoes, some wheat, and a pig to cut into pepperoni. It's fairly complicated, but believe it or not, Apple's operating system is built off of this. For people who aren't even nerdier than I am, Ubuntu is one of the more popular free linux-based operating systems, and, well, it works.

Phones

Windows - No.

Okay fine. Windows phones are a thing that exist because Microsoft wanted money basically, and currently none of them are recommendable to anyone. The only possible benefit is that they can connect more thoroughly with other Windows things, but even that isn't going very well.

Apple - Once again, amazing low-spec devices. This time around though, they actually get the job done. Other than terrible battery life and an expectably stupid price, they match pretty much every other smart phone in every way. They don't have certain interesting options (like NFC and other various doo-hickeys), but they can make and take calls. Also, it was recently found out that Apple devices are as a whole way more secure than Androids, most manufacturers stop putting out updates for their Android devices relatively quickly which makes them vulnerable to hacking. However, if you don't store your credit information on your phone ,that really isn't a big issue at all.

Android - These are almost literally infinitely customizable software-wise. If it's not available on your device, you can hack it to look like another one. You can also force updates, and do pretty much anything else you want. With all the models out there, it's also pretty likely you'll find one with a feature set perfect for you.

Tablets

Anroid and Apple are pretty much the same as their phones on these, Apple has three main options with a few generations for each, there are a bunch of different Android options and they all have super customability.

Windows - The Surface series is the windows attempt at a tablet, but there are a few two-in-ones that sort of fit here too. These are actually interesting, because they have desktop and laptop grade processers with the full power those offer (which is a lot.) That said, they're hit or miss. I've used a first gen Surface Pro, and it had basically every problem a computer could have. In addition, they lose the main reason to buy anything with Windows on it which is customability; they can't be upgraded at all period. The power is (like Apple desktops) useful for content creators though.

Wearables

Windows - It's a fitbit with a bigger screen and a smaller battery.

Apple - It's really expensive and doesn't have an always-on option, but it's useful for a smartwatch.

Android - Interesting thing here, the processor in (almost all, the original moto 360 is the only exception from an actual brand) of these is a snapdragon 600. In human terms: the same processor in a galaxy s4. Basically, they're as powerful as most android phones and only a little less powerful than even the newest ones. 

Pebble - Weeklong batter life, solid features, lacks power and looks bad, 

All right, that's a description of the major types of things you can use. If you read this far, congratulations, you deserve a cookie. Go ahead and grab one. 

The Things I most Look Forward to in Life

1. Travel - Assuming we don't nuke everywhere into a parking lot, I raelly want to explore the world for a few reasons. First and most important of those: imitation food SUCKS. Iwant to order from restaraunts that don't focus on making the food look authentic, just making food that tastes good. Also, other countries have some pretty views I guess.

2. Feeling Productive - I realize that I probably won't be the president or a super famous actor, but even moving boxes for a company feels more productive than doing school work, which we constantly chuck into recycle bins and trash cans everywhere. I accept the value of high school and know that it prepares me to be a productive member of society, but it still stinks really badly.

3. Choosing what my house looks like - We have a console TV. For those of you who don't know what that is, it qualifies as an antique and is a a giant wooden box with a screen. I want more of an open floor plan in my house whenever I get one, and my furniture wil be "function over form" for sure.

4. Not needing to ask everyone for eveything - This isn't like the "complete freedom" that teens stereotypically and idealistically want. I just want the capability to buy $5 things off of ebay without needing to wait a few hours for someone to get home, drive a few minutes to someone's house or a movie without needing to check six different schedules and calling four people a thousand times each to make sure I can.

5. Controlling My Own Diet - "Oh, you're too thin! SHOVE ALL OF THIS FOOD INTO YOUR MOUTH RIGHT NOW!!!" Believe it or not, I don't want a diet of only Reese's peanut butter cups and Hershey bars. I just want to not have people yell at me for not feeling like inhaling eight plates of pasta.     

Privacy and Freedom or Security?

     So recently, the website Reddit removed a very special clause from the so-called "transparency report" it published this year called a "Warrant Canary." I know, neither of those terms mean anything to most of you, and Reddit probably means very little to you as well. Here's a replacement phrase you might've heard of: Gag Order. That's basically what the removal says: the government took user's data from Reddit, and it isn't supposed to tell people.

     OK, so something happened with the government that Reddit isn't allowed to talk about, big deal right? Well, YES. IT IS A BIG DEAL. The removal of the clause is the ONLY legal way Reddit is allowed to tell people that the government asked for data about its users. Until recently, someone given a secret request by the data couldn't even tell their lawyers about it. If that sounds unconstitutional, that's because the entire CONCEPT is.

     Federal agencies (usually the NSA, which of course has never done anything sketchy. Ever.) is allowed to do this through the parts of George Bush's Patriot Act, which has received partial extensions overtime, though other parts have been removed because seriously even the government occasionally realizes something is stupid.

     So, here's the real point this issue brings up: terrorism obviously exists and terrorists obviously kill people, but at what point does protecting against it cause more harm than good? Every citizen of the United States has a certain set of unalienable rights....but apparently "unalienable" only applies when there aren't threats.

Fun fact: The British were fought by people who counted as "threats." "Threats" keep a government in check and make sure that it doesn't use its power in any unjust ways. Sure, this time the threat really does give the people of the nation a reason to fear, but what is the insurance worth?

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees" - Emiliano Zapato, Mexican Revolutionary  

Foundations Vol. II

     I sighed after he passed by me. He looked familiar, but I had no idea where I'd seen him before. It was just something about him...his eyes maybe? The shape of his face? I had better things to worry about. "Couldn't even have given me a dollar," I said to myself, "I guess I'll have to wait and get more another time." I sighed again, then stood up. The biggest issue with my homelessness had always been the boredom. I could always scavenge some food up from somewhere, and my car's heater kept me warm enough, but the boredom killed me. So, like almost every other homeless guy I met, I turned to drugs.
     I know the look you're giving me right now, so before you say anything else let me just say that you don't have the SLIGHTEST idea of exactly how boring being homeless is. I had a job, I never had any problems with staying alive, but I could only sleep so much, and every day has twenty-four hours. I worked as a cashier in a Mcdonald's; Before my boss fired me from my office job, I was actually just another desk jockey working nine-to-five.
     So let me explain how I became homeless; my roommate's check bounced and my landlord didn't legally have to tell me. That's it. That's the whole reason. Dumb right? To be fair, I couldn't have covered both payments anyways, so it's not like it would've made a difference. Of course, I couldn't find a place with a shower until I got used to being homeless, and eventually people at work started complaining at the stench. Boom, the boss man fired me.
     Okay, now back to the drugs. I met this one guy, everyone I knew called him Tim. He was kind of a prick, but he had good weed, and that was all that mattered. Never tried to kill me either, so we gradually became friends. I asked him a ton of stuff about his life, and apparently the first time he started drinking when he was twelve because his parents were abusive and his life spiralled out of control from there.
      Him telling me about his childhood always made me think of my own. I never saw my parents much, they were always busy working and trying to get by. They were always pressed for cash and worried about the next payday, almost all of my clothes were bought in a yearly trip to the Salvation Army, etc. Dad died a few years ago of a heart attack, and Mom and I haven't talked since. I kinda miss her, but it's my own fault that I can't see her without feeling guilty. According to my brother Aaron, she's doing all right. Maybe I should see about a vacation to visit them and apologize for everything...

Why All the Presidential Candidates Suck

     Answer this truthfully, are any of the candidates for the election this year actually "good"? Do any of them really seem like the ideal president? The next JFK, the next Reagan, the next Roosevelt? No, they all just really rock at not being good. So why did we go from people like Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Jimmy Carter, George H. Bush, and John McCain, all of whom were at least respectable individuals, to people like Donald Racist Trump, Benjamin Sleepy Carson, and Hillary E-mails Clinton, who are basically just competing for "Least Bad"?

     First of all, the candidates are the only thing that got worse. The media did. Originally, something done by a president/candidate only made the news if it were absolutely horrendous by the standards of the time. The first Clinton was nearly impeached, Nixon made Watergate happen, Reagan funded a terrorist organization. Nowadays, Hillary's shoes didn't match her shirt. Trump's hair makes the news more often than every other candidate combined. Everything each of them says is recorded and makes it to Twitter in about two minutes. However, humans generally aren't entertained by knowing the "good" things about other humans.

     Ben Carson was the first person in all of literally ever to successfully separate conjoined twins (which took a ridiculous amount of planning, time, and knowledge), then did it again just because he wanted to. Meanwhile he's known as the dumbest candidate (admittedly his political experience and knowledge are lacking, but still calling a neurosurgeon dumb is...well...dumb.) The media's portrayal is everything nowadays, and that is why Trump holds such a massive advantage over the other candidates.

     How many of the candidates have been on television more than five times before they ran for office? This one doesn't need Google: Hillary has some experience from being first lady, and Trump has actually been on television shows way too much. This is why, of all the candidates, he seems most honest: most people have heard him talk in a "real life" setting before, and he sounds the same now. Hillary never became actually famous, and no one's heard the other candidate's viewpoints before, so they can't know if the candidates are telling the truth. This also explains why Jeb Bush was doomed from the start: everyone knew his brother's viewpoints and nobody likes him now that he's out of office.

      Secondly, the main candidates are actually awful by comparison. Sure, Bush wasn't the sharpest tool in the white shed (being my personal least favorite president yet), but he was at least patriotic, good at getting attention, experienced with Washington due to his father, and able to rally people behind 9/11 well. Carson's smart, but he's not good at getting attention (the rest goes for most of the candidates who didn't do well). Hillary's experienced, but she had a massive e-mail scandal. And Trump is Trump.    
   
     Lastly, none of the recent candidates have been important compared to past politicians. What's the absolute biggest issue of this election? Maybe ISIS, maybe the economy, but it's really just the same old stuff. Obama had the recession (the economy may be down, but it's slowly getting better,) Bush had the Iraq War. Any memorable presidents had MASSIVE issues to handle when they got in office, and the public until recently had a longer attention span, so it makes sense that they would be more cautious about certain topics for a while after they occurred (y'know...that gives me an idea for another post...). Trump, interestingly enough, completely solved the problem of not having a problem by making a problem: his wall and deportation policies makes it seem like illegal immigration will doom the entire country forever. Creating such an issue drew positive attention to him from people who think it's a problem. He's the only candidate who actually promises major developments people with viewpoints similar to his, and everyone else is too divided among the other options to present real competition.

     Okay, I'm done with this so I don't give myself carpal tunnel any earlier than I have to or bore you guys to death. I hope this gave at least a few people some insight into the election.

Donald Trump (Except the Wall and Muslims)

     The ethics of what Donald Trump wants to do if he gets into office are quite love-it-or-hate-it, but no one seems to talk about anything he'll do that doesn't involve Muslims or Mexicans. So, naturally, as one of the biggest haters of Trump and his supporters in the school, my first reaction to his website was to think it was...honestly not the worst thing ever. I know right? I thought I'd hate it too. Sure his slogan's everywhere, but at least the url doesn't take you to another candidates site. Let's work though his positions in order:

Healthcare

      Healthcare reforms are fun. Every Republican hates Obamacare, every Democrat hates...every Republican and therefore anything that isn't Obamacare. So of course he wants rid of it, and honestly, even though I think Obamacare was a step in the right direction that had a ton of unfortunate issues, I can agree to that simply to remove the controversy and get SOMETHING worked out. Other than this, The biggest parts of Trump's healthcare reform are basically like this:

1. Allow interstate healthcare - I honestly wasn't aware this was illegal, but making it legal is a fantastic idea, ESPECIALLY in Pennsylvania with all the issues about UPMC and Highmark. Usually, just encouraging competition between firms isn't enough to reduce prices by any worthwhile amount, but when 49 extra states-worth of companies are available for choosing, the effects would definitely matter. 

2. Requiring price transparency from all healthcare providers - if Trump becomes president and your doctor looks more tired than usual, this might be why. Though another excellent idea that would at least prevent the shock of a bill after someone's sick, this could prove to be ridiculously hard to calculate in many cases. Assuming that would be taken into consideration though, two points for Trump. 

3. Let states handle Medicaid - Here's where we start falling apart. Though not a bad idea on paper, some state governments have a tendency to suck really, really badly at doing...well...anything. Admittedly though, this would allow access to some resources the federal government could (if we're lucky) use better.  

4. Letting foreign products into the US market - This really shocked me, and honestly made me doubt that Trump actually hates everyone that isn't American (...a little). Though frankly I'm not sure how big of a benefit this would have, it's certainly at least a little beneficial. The FDA will need more inspectors, and medicines from other countries would get FDA-tested so people from those countries would know that they're safe too. 

Veteran-Care Reforms

For those of you who don't know, the VA is extremely sucky. Tons of veterans die from poor treatment, the administator's have taken advantage of company funding more than usual, and most employees hate it.

1. Increase funding for PTSD, brain injuries, and suicide prevention services for veterans - This....works? I mean, it's not bad, but it definitely isn't specific at all. Every politician promises something or other like this.

2. Increase funding for job training and stuff like that - Again, not a bad idea, just really vague. 

3. Transform the VA to meet the needs of 21st century veterans - Again with the vagueness, but in this one it matters much more. What the h*ll does this  even mean? It mentions providing support for female veterans, but that is the entirety of the next point, and doesn't explain at all what this point means. 

4. Better support our women veterans - Staffing OBGYN at every VA is a fantastic idea. That's all there is to that.

Wait...did I make a mistake somewhere? Why did Trump put three numbered lists here? Why are most of the points the exact same? What on earth? I guess I'll do the last one too since it varies a little bit.

1-2 Fire the corrupt.../End waste... - Wow, fantastic. I'd love to see this pulled off. No politician has ever promised anything like this either! Ending corruption? WOW! WHAT A NOVEL IDEA!!! 

Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it, but sure it looks nice on paper.

3. Modernize the VA - Okay THIS modernization point makes more sense. Again, great on paper, but nothing revolutionary or interesting, even to me.

4. Empower caregivers to ensure our veterans receive quality care quickly - Huzzah for buzzwords I guess? 

5. Hire more veterans to care for veterans - This idea is interesting, but honestly hard to perform. The veterans who desperately need jobs likely don't have full doctor or nursing qualifications, so they couldn't apply or wouldn't actually be effective. That said, it's not a terrible idea for ex-military doctors and nurses.

6. Embed satellite VA clinics in rural and other underserved areas - First of all, underserved is not a word and made this hard to understand at all. Okay, tonal point aside, this is another good idea that I don't actually believe will be pulled off. I have no trust.

Tax Reform

Everybody hates taxes, but everybody needs the things the government uses them for. It's a pretty delicate balance, but right now that balance is messed up badly anyway.

1.  Remove anyone who makes under 25,000 or any married couples who make under 50,000 from the tax bracket - He topped titling them, this makes me sad. Digging through tax stats reveals to me that this is honestly the best idea I've read yet from Trump. Though even I am unwilling to figure out how this would affect the employment of the IRS and the government, this alleviation on lower class households would put their money into the economy instead of needing to buy everything on Food Stamps or from craigslist. This relatively low amount of money can make a significant difference in the quality of living for the lower class, without a significant dent in the government's income.

2. Simplify the tax bracket - This would heavily reduce America's tax income. As noted in the previous link, a vast majority of America's income comes from the upper class, and Trump plans to cut somewhere near 15% from the income tax of the extremely wealthy. This cut is a reduction in the area or around 70 billion dollars from the government (compared to likely near 17 billion from the 50% drop). This amount is absolutely more important to the government than to the people who currently have it.

3. No business would pay above 15% annual income - Google provided me with no information on how much of America's tax this makes up, but this might encourage corporations to create more jobs in America. Of course, that is assuming that corporations would want or be forced to put that money towards people, otherwise, this just makes the "1%" more powerful.

4. Removal of the Death Tax - See, I never knew these existed. Assuming Wikipedia is right, they (practically) don't. This only assists the "1%," and actually even less than that, who have an estate over 5 million dollars. On the state level, this only affects people (who fall below an inheritance that isn't ridiculously high) in four states, and this is assuming he could actually get legislature controlling state tax rates.

5. One-time Outsourcing Jobs Tax - There is no statistic on this, and I can't even speculate on what this would be. Good idea, if it makes enough to cover the changes.

Gun Control

Passing on most of this. I do approve the mental health evaluation stuff, but the rest is either love it or hate it. 

Immigration Reform

Okay, I know I said I wouldn't go into this, but I promise I'll only go into the economics of it and not start screaming over more love-it-or-hate-it ethics. First and foremost, even I will agree that it does in theory work out relatively well economically. Removing an entire group of people from the employment equation would reduce unemployment in America, but it would lead to Mexico getting even worse, which is an issue that would have to be dealt with eventually. Okay, going off this before I make it extremely debatable. 

Chinese-Trade Reform

The undervaluing of the Yuan is heavily debated. No one actually knows if it's still actually undervalued since it has gained about 33% of its value in the past ten years. Whether he is right or wrong on this, the accusation would definitely anger China, and possibly make them cease trade with the United States. In addition, increasing the value of the Chinese Yuan would increase the cost of any item produced in the country drastically, leading to some heavy inflation in every other country as well. Everything else in that section is just a bunch of promises made by every politician every year.

So, discounting the ethics of the wall and a ban on Muslims, what do I think of Trump? Actually, I have no idea. Almost the entirety of his plan relies on the complete removal of illegal immigrants, which has extremely hard to predict effects on the economy of the United States. The rest of what he offers is just the same thing spat out by every politician to get voters, so it can neither be counted for him nor believed in. In any case, that's all he wrote, and I hope this analysis helped some people see everything about the comedian runner.  

Motivation Thing

So...is this channel just short, animated TED talks? That's pretty cool.

My first thought on viewing was "Umm...what?" My second thought was "Oh so that's why people play video games." So that makes sense now at least.

The biggest question this gave me: why? Why do humans feel the need to progress and improve over what we've done? Why don't we, like every other animal, just worry about exactly what we need to survive?

Technically, we still do: I constantly talk about how important our capability to adapt is, and this shows that at least subconsciously everyone probably realizes it as well. The mental need to develop new skills and improve what humans already know allows them to adapt more into different scenarios - what's the point of learning a language if not to be able to live in the country that speaks it? -  so this is one the major benefactors to our continued survival as a species.

Other than making me feel good about my adaptation beliefs, the knowledge gained from study in this video will almost definitely improve nearly every aspect of humanity (eventually). Currently, most people just get jobs for the money, employers give friends extra money instead of making them actually do stuff, and honestly I haven't seen many smiling rich people (though I don't have any statistics to back that up).

Greed makes sense: every animal stocks up for winter, and humans do the same. This proves that there is more to life than stockpiling, which is great for the future sure, but not great for the even further future. Hopefully, every place of employment (and schools) will take this study into consideration in the future, though I doubt it will make any difference for a while simply because humans typically hate change.